www.testseek.co.uk ALL REVIEWS
BEST PRICES
ONE SITE!
 

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Printers » Inkprinters » Canon Pixma Pro-1



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon Pixma Pro-1

Testseek.co.uk have collected 37 expert reviews of the Canon Pixma Pro-1 and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon Pixma Pro-1.
Award: Most Awarded February 2012
February 2012


Experts
79%
37 Reviews


Users
-
0 Reviews
79 0 100 37
Score this product:

The editors liked

  • Exceptional prints on both gloss and matte stocks
  • Wide colour gamut
  • Large ink tanks
  • Good stock support
  • Excellent colour and mono prints
  • High volume ink tanks
  • Excellent software
  • Robust build quality
  • Exceptional prints on both gloss and matte stocks. Wide colour gamut. Large ink tanks. Good stock support
  • 12 colors of inks produce excellent output quality
  • Wideformat
  • Five black inks can generate excellent monochrome prints

The editors didn't like

  • Photoshop plug-in needs work
  • Premium price
  • Large and heavy
  • No borderless on some fine art paper
  • Custom profiles required for highest quality
  • Photoshop plugin needs work
  • Large
  • Heavy
  • And pricey (if we must complain)
  • Limited to 13inch media

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 4
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2013-12-16, Author: Ted Needleman , review by: Digitaltrends.com

  • 12 colors of inks produce excellent output quality, Wideformat, Five black inks can generate excellent monochrome prints
  • Large, heavy, and pricey (if we must complain), Limited to 13inch media
  • Given its size and heft, and the fact that this is the top model in the Pixma Pro line, it's surprising that Canon decided to limit the Pro-1's media handling capabilities to 13 inches. But other than that, our only complaint is the weight. Even that i...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


Score
80%
 
  Published: 2013-07-13, Author: Kat Orphanides , review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • It produces some of the best photos we’ve ever seen, but this printer is very expensive to buy and run...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
Score
80%
 
  Published: 2012-05-11, Author: Marcus Hawkins , review by: techradar.com

  • Excellent colour and mono prints, High volume ink tanks, Excellent software, Robust build quality
  • Premium price, Large and heavy, No borderless on some fine art paper, Custom profiles required for highest quality
  • There's lots to like here, from the confidence-inspiring build quality and performance to the commercially sound ink price and print longevity. Although it doesn't redefine our expectations of desktop printing - the Epson Stylus Pro R3000 and Canon Pixma...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
Score
90%
 
  Published: 2012-01-30, review by: pcadvisor.co.uk

  • Owners of the 9500 Mk II may not find an immediate reason to upgrade to the Pro-1, but if you do need a new printer for proofing or making saleable prints, Canon’s Pixma Pro-1 is the new one to want. ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
Score
90%
 
  Published: 2012-01-16, Author: Neil Bennett , review by: macworld.co.uk

  • Exceptional prints on both gloss and matte stocks; wide colour gamut; large ink tanks; good stock support
  • Photoshop plug-in needs work

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


Score
100%
 
  Published: 2011-11-20, Author: Neil Bennett , review by: digitalartsonline.co.uk

  • Exceptional prints on both gloss and matte stocks. Wide colour gamut. Large ink tanks. Good stock support
  • Photoshop plugin needs work

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


Score
90%
 
  Published: 2014-04-01, review by: consumersearch.com

  • Superb photos up to 13 by 19 inches, 12 big ink tanks, Fast, automatic black ink switching, Chroma optimizer improves glossy prints, Smooth and reliable
  • Tweaks needed to get best B&W matte prints
  • Canon's Pixma Pro-1 makes it easy to produce gorgeous prints perfect for exhibition or sale, experts say. The Epson Stylus Photo R3000 (Est. $650) comes close, but owners say it can clog up, break down and leave marks on prints -- complaints rarely seen w...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-04-17, review by: photographyblog.com

  • Abstract:  It's not often that a company brings out a totally new product in an existing category where they already have at least one offering. In the case of Canon, and 13x19 printers, there were two models - the dye ink 9000, and the pigment ink 9500, both of...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-08-14, review by: techreviewsource.com

  • Magnificent photo quality. Especially good for monochrome photos. Abovepar graphics and text. Highercapacity ink tanks than its rivals.
  • Relatively slow. Large and heavy. Pricey for an A3printer. Can't print from paper rolls
  • The Canon Pixma PRO-1 is large, slow, and expensive for an A3+ photo printer, but it delivers where it counts: in producing magnificent, gallery-quality prints....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
Score
80%
 
  Published: 2012-07-20, Author: Tony Hoffman , review by: pcmag.com

  • Magnificent photo quality. Especially good for monochrome photos. Above-par graphics and text. Higher-capacity ink tanks than its rivals.
  • Relatively slow. Large and heavy. Pricey for an A3+ printer. Can't print from paper rolls
  • The Canon Pixma PRO-1 is large, slow, and expensive for an A3+ photo printer, but it delivers where it counts: in producing magnificent, gallery-quality prints....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
Score
80%
    page 1 of 4 « Previous   1 2 3 4   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category

Shop from merchants


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×




Time : 0.298s | 79 Queries | GZIP : Off | Memory Usage: 865.27 KB