www.testseek.co.uk ALL REVIEWS
BEST PRICES
ONE SITE!
 

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD FX-8120 3.1GHz socket AM3+



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews     Best prices    

Reviews of AMD FX-8120 3.1GHz socket AM3+

Testseek.co.uk have collected 34 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8120 3.1GHz socket AM3+ and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8120 3.1GHz socket AM3+.


Experts
82%
34 Reviews


Users
-
0 Reviews
82 0 100 34
Score this product:

 

Reviews

page 1 of 4
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-10-22, review by: vortez.net

  • The AMD Bulldozer architecture certainly has its advantages when the applications can utilise all of the cores and threads when you compare it to their older Phenom II range of processors. However, in certain games, it does appear to perform worse. Ev...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2012-07-24, Author: Chris Finnamore , review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • It's a niche product and Intel's processors are generally faster, but this good-value Bulldozer chip is still the king of multitasking...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
Score
80%
 
  Published: 2013-02-11, Author: Don Woligroski , review by: tomshardware.com

  • Abstract:  Now that Piledriver-based CPUs and APUs are widely available (and the FX-8350 is selling for less than $200), it's a great time to compare value-oriented chips in our favorite titles. We're also breaking out a test that conveys the latency between frames....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-12-23, review by: tomshardware.com

  • Abstract:  Benchmarking 86 CPUs takes a while. After long last, though, we have 51 models from AMD and 35 from Intel tested in our current suite. If you want to know how your processor sizes up to its competition, you'll find plenty of comparison data inside! 86 C...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-08-29, review by: insidehw.com

  • Abstract:  Not long after the launch of Bulldozer, AMD have filled their ranks with an entire gamma of CPUs based on this microarchitecture, with the prefix FX, which is a marketing trick supposed to remind us of the “good old times” when FX CPUs were the alpha a...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-07-27, review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • Sadly, its more of the same bad news for AMD or anyone with a Socket AM3+ motherboard looking for a decent CPU for around the £150 mark. The FX-8120 just isn't a good choice when it comes to the kind of applications we run on our PCs. It's regularly ou...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
Score
59%
 
  Published: 2012-07-04, review by: madshrimps.be

  • The CPU presentation box is very special, much more interesting than the solution chosen by Intel; the included CPU cooler is pretty loud and we recommend acquiring a custom cooling solution right from the start. By using a high-end air CPU cooler, ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-03-15, review by: rbmods.com

  • Good performance in multithread programs, Availability, Price
  • Bad performance in single thread, Power consumption (especially if overclocked)
  • FX-8120, like the Bulldozer platform in whole, is bit of a weird product on the market. While it has mediocre performance in multithreaded programs, it falls far behind similarly priced Intel processors in singlethreaded programs. Intel i5 2500K did b...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-12-15, review by: xbitlabs.com

  • Two months ago when we tested the top desktop Bulldozer processor, we concluded that it turned out a big disappointment. The results of our today’s FX series testing, including lower-cost CPU modifications, didn’t change out opinion. Processors on Bul...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-07, Author: Carl Nelson , review by: HardCOREware.net

  • Due to issues with customs/logistics (no fault of AMD's), we're a bit late with our Bulldozer review. I suppose that is fitting in this case, but luckily, this gives us the chance to take a bit more time with the review, testing the Bulldozer CPU under it...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 4 « Previous   1 2 3 4   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category

Shop from merchants


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×




Time : 0.378s | 76 Queries | GZIP : Off | Memory Usage: 851.3 KB