www.testseek.co.uk ALL REVIEWS
BEST PRICES
ONE SITE!
 

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD FX-6100 3.3GHz Socket AM3+



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-6100 3.3GHz Socket AM3+

Testseek.co.uk have collected 21 expert reviews of the AMD FX-6100 3.3GHz Socket AM3+ and the average rating is 69%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-6100 3.3GHz Socket AM3+.


Experts
69%
21 Reviews


Users
-
0 Reviews
69 0 100 21
Score this product:

The editors liked

  • AMD'
  • S latest microarchitecture
  • Decent multi-threading throughout

The editors didn't like

  • Weak per-core performance
  • Jury'
  • S out on module re-enabling

 

Reviews

page 1 of 3
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2013-05-28, review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  On June 4 Intel is launching its next generation Core processors, also called Haswell. That means it's the perfect opportunity for us to retest all current processors and a number of older ones with a completely new test configuration. It will not only ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-12-01, review by: techradar.com

  • AMD's latest microarchitecture, Decent multi-threading throughout
  • Weak per-core performance, Jury's out on module re-enabling
  • When is a six-core PC processor not a six-core PC processor? When it's AMD's new FX 6100 Black Edition.Long before AMD released its fancy new FX chips, we had a feeling a fisticuffs was brewing over the definition of what constitutes a processor core. ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
Score
70%
 
  Published: 2013-03-25, review by: ixbtlabs.com

  • Abstract:  We've already reviewed the top processor of AMD's Vishera family, FX-8350. That was just the beginning of the big refresh for the Socket AM3+ platform. AMD has also rolled out a number of more affordable CPUs. Today we're going to cover them in compari...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-12-23, review by: tomshardware.com

  • Abstract:  Benchmarking 86 CPUs takes a while. After long last, though, we have 51 models from AMD and 35 from Intel tested in our current suite. If you want to know how your processor sizes up to its competition, you'll find plenty of comparison data inside! 86 C...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-01-25, review by: ixbtlabs.com

  • Abstract:  This time we'd like to offer you the summarized test results of as many as 71 processors. This generally marks the end of the year, not the end of another test method's life cycle (like the last time). We believe this summary contains all important pro...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-12-15, review by: xbitlabs.com

  • Two months ago when we tested the top desktop Bulldozer processor, we concluded that it turned out a big disappointment. The results of our today’s FX series testing, including lower-cost CPU modifications, didn’t change out opinion. Processors on Bul...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-12-06, review by: Behardware.com

  • New processor architectures don’t come round all that often and there was a great deal of excitement in anticipation of Bulldozer. Breaking with the traditional vision of cores, its CMT architecture was indeed promising on paper but its integration wit...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-07, Author: Carl Nelson , review by: HardCOREware.net

  • Due to issues with customs/logistics (no fault of AMD's), we're a bit late with our Bulldozer review. I suppose that is fitting in this case, but luckily, this gives us the chance to take a bit more time with the review, testing the Bulldozer CPU under it...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-12-01, Author: Jeremy Laird , review by: techradar.com/au/

  • AMD's latest microarchitecture, Decent multithreading throughout
  • Weak percore performance, Jury's out on module reenabling

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
Score
70%
 
  Published: 2012-07-25, Author: Jean-Luc Marianna , review by: erenumerique.fr

  • Abstract:  Le choix du processeur reste l'élément essentiel à prendre en compte lors de l'achat d'un PC. Il détermine en grande partie la puissance de l'ordinateur et aussi l'usage que l'on peut en faire suivant ses caractéristiques. Faisons un point sur l'offre exi...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 3 « Previous   1 2 3   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category

Shop from merchants


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×




Time : 0.115s | 80 Queries | GZIP : Off | Memory Usage: 852.03 KB