Testseek.co.uk have collected 68 expert reviews of the AMD Athlon 2 X4 620 2.6GHz AM3 and the average rating is 87%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Athlon 2 X4 620 2.6GHz AM3.
September 2009
Experts 87% 68 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Abstract: Verdict: An amazingly cheap quad-core processor, but its small cache means it's not an all-rounder. AMD has released so many processors recently that even we've been struggling to keep up. It has even muddied the dividing line between its brands, la...
Bargain price it retails around £7080, It Overclocks like a dream, Performs as well or better than a Phenom 955 at similar speeds.
You need to overclock to get the best out of it.
As you can see from the results of the numerous benchmarks for the most part at similar clock speeds the AMD X4 620 is toe to toe with its more expensive stable mate. I believe this is almost certainly down to the fact that due to the higher bus speed...
Abstract: AMD continue to drive us mad with their product names (there is no reason why this chip could not be called the Phenom 2 X4 620) but as far as the product itself goes it is hard not to be impressed.
Abstract: With the recent introduction of Intel’s new LGA 1156-based Core i5 and Core i7 processors, AMD faces even more pressure in the competitive upper-mainstream and high-end market segments. Phenom II is a great processor design, but it can only beat Intel’...
Abstract: I tested the system with only one case fan running and no discrete graphics card (the M4A785TD-M EVO’s IGP is an ATI HD 4200) to more accurately simulate a quiet home-media setup. Performance was..
and Final Thoughts It's difficult not to be impressed by the AMD Athlon II 620 X4. It provides a genuine 2.6GHz quad-core processor that will work perfectly well in either your current AM2+ motherboard, making it even more of a bargain, as it would pr...
We really find it difficult to recommend the Athlon II X4 to anyone because it has very few redeeming features. Its very high power use for the minimal transistor count is strange and confusing: why is there the need to throw at hefty 1.4V through the ...
